Concord: Subject-Verb Agreement
Hello,
welcome to Dissecting Grammar. Today, I will like to discuss a very important
topic in grammar. I have titled it as “Concord: Subject-Verb Agreement.” Concord
is one of the aspects of
English grammar that often poses a serious challenge to non native speakers of
English language, especially to Nigerian learners of the language. In fact, it
is one of the most confused topics in grammar which, indeed, occupies a central
place in the grammar of English. One, therefore, needs to master it properly.
Concord has to do with agreement between parts of a
sentence. For instance, if a subject consists of a noun phrase and it is singular,
e.g. ‘the boy’ then, the verb phrase in the same clause also has to be
in the singular form, e.g. ‘hits’. So you can now have:
1. The boy hits the table.
1. The boy hits the table.
Not
2. The boy hit the table.
3. The boys hit the table.
2. The boy hit the table.
3. The boys hit the table.
Not
4. The boys hits the table.
4. The boys hits the table.
I want you to know that plural verbs do not appear with
‘s’ as it is with plural
nouns. What this means is that, when a verb is singular, it normally appears
with an ‘s’, e.g. ‘hits’ and
when it is plural, the ‘s’
disappears, e.g. ‘hit.’ So, we talk of subject – verb concord when there
is an agreement between the subject of a sentence and the verb in that
sentence. In (1), the subject of the
sentence is ‘the boy’, and it
is singular. It agrees with the verb ‘hits’
which is also singular. In the same manner, the subject of the sentence in (3)
is ‘the boys’ which is a
plural noun. It has to agree with the verb ‘hit’ which is also plural.
As we can see in the sentences above, there is
subject-verb agreement in (1) and (3), making them grammatically acceptable,
while there is lack of such agreement in the (2) and (4), making them
grammatically unacceptable.
The presence of concord is felt in:
Number Whether a constituent is in singular form or plural
form.
Person Whether
a constituent is in 1st, 2nd or 3rd person
form.
Gender Whether
a constituent is masculine, feminine or neuter.
Apart
from subject- verb concord which is being discussed now, there are other areas
or cases of concord which are also very important. They are: Noun-Pronoun Agreement (e.g. Cockroaches
are in this room, look at them), Subject-Subject Complement
Agreement (e.g. Fayose and Wike are governors),
Object-Object Complement Agreement (e.g. we see them as speakers),
and Demonstrative-Head Noun Agreement (e.g. this man is a writer). As I
mentioned earlier, I will, in this article, focus more attention on Subject –
Verb Agreement because it poses a lot of challenges to most people.
You will agree with me that English language, like
other languages, is rule governed. For us to understand some basic things in
English grammar, we must first acquaint ourselves with the basic rules that
govern the use of the grammar. I shall be exploring some of the rules that
apply in Subject –Verb Agreement in this piece. Follow me.
1. Indefinite
pronouns like anyone, everyone,
someone, no one, and nobody are always
singular. They, therefore, require singular verbs.
- Everyone
has arrived
here.
- Somebody
has left
her purse.
- Nobody
indicates interest to contest
for the post.
However,
some indefinite pronouns such as all,
some are singular or plural depending on what they are referring to.
Before you use them, ask yourself the question ‘Is what I am referring to a countable noun or not? Be careful when
you choose a verb to accompany such pronouns.
Examples:
- Some
of the beads are missing.
- Some
of the water is gone.
- All is
well.
- All
the vehicles were damaged.
2.
Whenever the subject is
detached from the verb by some intruding words or phrases like along with, as well as, alongside,
besides, not, together with, with, etc., always use
the verb that agrees with the subject. If the subject is singular, use a singular
verb and vise versa. Try to ignore those intruding words. They are not part of
the subject.
- The
student as well as his brothers is going home.
- The lecturers, together
with the student, are being punished.
- Aisha,
alongside
her parents, has arrived.
- The
players, not their coach have
entered the pitch.
3. Please note that the conjunctions ‘or’ and ‘nor’ do
not conjoin (as ‘and’ does).
So, whenever ‘nor’ or ‘or’ is used, the subject closer
to the verb determines the number of the verb. It does not matter whether the
subject comes before or after the verb. What matters here is the proximity,
that is, the nearness of the verb to the subject. This proximity determines the
number.
Examples:
Neither the students nor their father is here.
Neither the student nor his parents are here.
Neither the student nor his parents are here.
Take a
look at other examples:
·
Are
either my brothers or my father responsible?
·
Is either my father or my brothers
responsible?
As you can see from the examples above,
the verbs agree with the subjects close to them, even when there are other
subjects that are still very important.
4. Though it
is generally agreed that a plural verb is used when two or more subjects are
connected by ‘and’, the case
is, however, different when compound nouns are used.
Normal examples:
A car and a bike
are my means of
transportation.
Peter and Paul sing beautiful
songs.
Now, note these
exceptions:
Aiding and
abetting crime is
against the law.
The bread and breakfast was charming.
Bread and
tea is good for
breakfast.
The underlined phrases above are compound nouns, so
the traditional rule does not apply.
5. Please note,
also, that the
words ‘there’ and ‘here’ are never subjects.
Whenever they begin any sentence, the true subject follows the verb.
Examples:
There are four hurdles
to jump.
There is a high hurdle
to jump.
Here are the keys.
As can be seen above, the real subjects in the
sentences are ‘hurdles’, ‘hurdle’ and ‘keys.’ They follow the
verbs but still determine the number of the verbs. This kind of construction is
called expletive constructions.
6. Always use a singular verb with distances, periods of time, sums of money,
etc., when considered as a unit.
Examples:
Three miles is too far to walk.
Twenty one years is
the maximum sentence for exam malpractice.
Ten dollars is
a high price to pay.
7. Some collective nouns, such as family, couple, staff, audience, etc., may take either a
singular or plural verb, depending on their use in the sentence.
Examples:
The staff
is in a meeting.
The couple
disagrees about disciplining their child.
OR
The staff are
in a meeting.
The couples
disagree about disciplining their child.
Please note that consistency
is the watchword here. If you decide to use them as either singular or plural,
then you have to stick to the one you use. They must be used accurately and
carefully. Also note that the use of ‘staffs’
and ‘couples’ as plural is
allowed in American English. Take a look at the following
flawed sentence:
The INEC staff is deliberating on how they will tackle the issue of
over voting.
It would be wrong to assign
the singular
‘is’ and the plural ‘they’ to ‘staff’ in the same sentence.
If you feel this rule is stringent to you and you want to escape it, fine.
There is a way out. What you need to do is simple. Try to re-write or re-order the sentence
thus:
The
members of staff of INEC are deliberating
on how they will tackle the
issue of over voting.
8. Sometimes modifiers will come between a subject and
its verb. These modifiers should not confuse the agreement between the subject
and its verb.
Example:
The
former governor, who has been convicted along with his two sons on four
counts of various crimes, is
finally going to jail.
9. If a sentence combines both a
positive and a negative subject and one is plural, the other singular, the verb
should agree with the positive subject.
Example:
- The
cabinet members, but not the President, have decided not to hold the weekly FEC meeting after
Easter holiday.
- It
is not the cabinet members, but the president who decides this issue.
- It
was the Vice Chancellor, not his ideas, that has provoked the students to riot.
I need to explain this point clearly. In
the first example, ‘the cabinet members’ is a positive subject while ‘not
the President’ is a negative one. The plural verb, which is ‘have’,
has to agree with the positive subject by jumping the subject close to it. This
is what happens in both the second and third sentences.
10.The word ‘were’
replaces ‘was’ in sentences that express a wish or are
contrary to fact:
Example:
If Abdul were
here, you'd be out of the game.
This implies that Abdul is not actually here, so we
say ‘were’, not ‘was.’
This sentence demonstrates what is called the subjunctive
mood in English. The
subjunctive mood is used to express things that are hypothetical, wishful,
imaginary, or factually contradictory. The subjunctive mood pairs singular
subjects with plural verbs.
Examples:
I wish it were Friday.
She requested that he raise his hand.
11.
Some words naturally end in -s
and appear to be plural. These words are, in real sense, singular and they
require singular verbs.
Examples
- The
news
about the fight against corruption is
good.
- Measles
is a dangerous disease.
- Economics
is my favourite subject.
Note:
The names of sports teams that
do not end in "s" take
plural verbs:
Examples:
Enyimba FC have arrived the camp ahead of the match.
I
believe you have learnt a lot of things from this article. Your comments and
suggestions are welcomed. Hit me up on the comment section here and on the
following handles:
Twitter:
@godwinowojecho
Facebook:facebook.com/Dissecting Grammar with Godwin.
Let’s
keep the conversation going. Thank you.
Comments
Post a Comment